<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Diversified ETF Portfolio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ei-forum.com/2008/11/07/diversified-etf-portfolio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ei-forum.com/2008/11/07/diversified-etf-portfolio/</link>
	<description>independent perspectives could make you a little wealthier...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 06:04:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Investor Forum</title>
		<link>http://ei-forum.com/2008/11/07/diversified-etf-portfolio/#comment-8261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Investor Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fmdm.wordpress.com/?p=1303#comment-8261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with many aspects of your diversified portfolio model, but I also feel that a 40:60 in Bond/Equity would work better in the current market situation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with many aspects of your diversified portfolio model, but I also feel that a 40:60 in Bond/Equity would work better in the current market situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ei-forum</title>
		<link>http://ei-forum.com/2008/11/07/diversified-etf-portfolio/#comment-8242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ei-forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fmdm.wordpress.com/?p=1303#comment-8242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Jack, we didn&#039;t know this fund - it looks quite interesting and could definitely be a good option (as a general rule we prefer ETFs to Mutual fund for a number of reasons). Also the treasuries are always a good option. We were replying to a specific reader question on all ETF portfolio but as you highlight, it is always better to be flexible when constructing an investment portfolio as there are a lot of very good option out there! Thank you once again for your comment!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Jack, we didn&#8217;t know this fund &#8211; it looks quite interesting and could definitely be a good option (as a general rule we prefer ETFs to Mutual fund for a number of reasons). Also the treasuries are always a good option. We were replying to a specific reader question on all ETF portfolio but as you highlight, it is always better to be flexible when constructing an investment portfolio as there are a lot of very good option out there! Thank you once again for your comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Pane</title>
		<link>http://ei-forum.com/2008/11/07/diversified-etf-portfolio/#comment-8228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Pane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 06:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fmdm.wordpress.com/?p=1303#comment-8228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see why there should be such restrictions on bond investments when there are Funds out there--like the American Century 2025 Fund, all in no-interest Treasuries--that pay 11% annually, all on cap gains. I am in this Fund, and that&#039;s what I&#039;ve collected over the past 10 years, making it my number one investment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see why there should be such restrictions on bond investments when there are Funds out there&#8211;like the American Century 2025 Fund, all in no-interest Treasuries&#8211;that pay 11% annually, all on cap gains. I am in this Fund, and that&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve collected over the past 10 years, making it my number one investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ei-forum</title>
		<link>http://ei-forum.com/2008/11/07/diversified-etf-portfolio/#comment-8222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ei-forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fmdm.wordpress.com/?p=1303#comment-8222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your note John - we agree! The idea behind the post was to give some general guidance... one could also start by just building the equity portion but indeed, under the current economic climate and market reality it would make sense to be more overweight stocks. However, it also depends on age and investment horizon... assuming someone is in his 30s with stable income, we would probably tend to be even 90% in equity for the next 5-10 years!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your note John &#8211; we agree! The idea behind the post was to give some general guidance&#8230; one could also start by just building the equity portion but indeed, under the current economic climate and market reality it would make sense to be more overweight stocks. However, it also depends on age and investment horizon&#8230; assuming someone is in his 30s with stable income, we would probably tend to be even 90% in equity for the next 5-10 years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://ei-forum.com/2008/11/07/diversified-etf-portfolio/#comment-8219</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 09:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fmdm.wordpress.com/?p=1303#comment-8219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keeping 40% in bonds is still a higher percentage. You trade on 60 cents of dollar on the regular transaction and 40 cents fixed to ensure the future is fair enough if you are not looking at making heavy gains. This breakdown or more so 40:60 in Bond/Equity will even work better during the slow phase. When numbers are towards north – having 80:20 in Equity/Bond would work great.

John

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jobsearchdigest.com/investment_banking_jobs&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Investment Banking Jobs&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keeping 40% in bonds is still a higher percentage. You trade on 60 cents of dollar on the regular transaction and 40 cents fixed to ensure the future is fair enough if you are not looking at making heavy gains. This breakdown or more so 40:60 in Bond/Equity will even work better during the slow phase. When numbers are towards north – having 80:20 in Equity/Bond would work great.</p>
<p>John</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jobsearchdigest.com/investment_banking_jobs" rel="nofollow">Investment Banking Jobs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

